Saturday, January 28, 2012

A Democrat Jesuit On A Catholic Republican Presidential Canidate

I don’t know where Rick Santorum was in 1960, but he was two years old. I was surrounded by Jesuit scholastics in philosophy studies. We knew the speech had been written with the advise of Catholic theologians and that Kennedy knew the proper role of conscience, as well as religion, in making public decisions. Meanwhile the issues which challenge Catholic conscience have grown, particularly in social justice, since the 1960s; and many, if not most, Catholics see the relationship between life issues as both more intimate and complex than those Kennedy faced. A study by Catholic Democrats shows that Santorum has among the worst voting records in the U.S. Congress on social justice and the family, though Santorum describes himself as “pro family.” In November 2011 he questioned the value of lower income children qualifying for Medicaid, food stamps, and housing assistance. “Why do these kids feel they are entitled to so much?...Suffering, if you’re a Christian, is part of life and it’s not a bad thing.” He favors massive tax cuts for the wealthy, wants to abolish public service unions, and denies humans are responsible for climate change. While the bishops have condemned torture in all its forms, in the televised debate Santorum endorsed water-boarding and “enhanced interrogation techniques.” He has long been pro-death penalty, but now says he’s thinking it over.
Link (here) to the full piece by Fr. Raymond A. Schroth, S.J. America Magazine

6 comments:

Sawyer said...

Of course a Jesuit would believe that the one of the most authentically Catholic politicians in America today is a bad Catholic.

bill bannon said...

Sorry the new Catholic position on the death penalty will
get inmates killed in prison by lifers who cannot be punished beyond their already given life sentence. Ask Jeffrey Dahmer and Fr. Geoghan who both were murdered by lifers in non death penalty states. The Church killed heretics from 1253 A.D. til the 18th century directly (see Exsurge Domine/ Pope Leo X/ art. 33 condemned). With the new anti death penalty position, the Church will kill inmates and guards indirectly for another 500 years. But the new position sounds good as a soundbite and is mandatory for Bishops and profs under the Profession of Faith. Thus did Arnold Toynbee admire us but maintain that we had aspects of an arrested culture.

Sawyer said...

Bill, the Catholic Church does not teach that capital punishment is always immoral. Some lefties in the Church clamor for a selective and distorted understanding of the Church's teaching and advocate abolishing capital punishment, but the Church does not stand for abolition; the Church affirms that states may have recourse to capital punishment, but only when necessary. The abolitionists are wrong, and dangerous.

bill bannon said...

Sawyer
Benedict wants abolition as did John Paul. I like your naivete though.

http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/pope-benedict-end-the-death-penalty/

What you didn't notice was that ccc#2267 is ignored by the magisterium and is faulty in the first place by conflating Scripture's affirmation of the dp with John Paul's imagining that every country can financially afford to put all
dangerous inmates in solitary which in the US costs 100K a
year. Liberals like the last two Popes ( birth control position makes people think all Popes are conservative..lol) always imagine governments with infinite budgets. If you had an infinite budget, you could put every inmate on earth in solitary, give them a laptop, and have them finish Harvard over the internet. The US budget for 60 years has never had money to spend on the mentally ill....except to give them enough to live in dangerous neighborhoods (I
visited them for a year in their neighborhoods right after my
college).

bill bannon said...

ps
ergo...if the US does not have money for the mentally ill then it obviously does not have money for perfect prisons and perfect prisons is the paradigm imagined by the last two Popes in respect to life sentences reallt protecting.

Maria said...

Of course a Jesuit would believe that the one of the most authentically Catholic politicians in America today is a bad Catholic.

Sawyer: He is an apostate. He doesn't believe in their 8th sacrament of sodomy.